Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation in view of the account being declared NPA on 30 June 2014, and whether the subsequent financial statements and the one-time settlement letter constituted acknowledgment of liability extending the period of limitation.
Analysis: The account was classified as NPA on 30 June 2014, but the record showed later signed financial statements and annual reports for subsequent years acknowledging the borrowings. The Tribunal also relied on the letter dated 04.01.2020 proposing one-time settlement, which expressly referred to settling the dues and therefore amounted to acknowledgment of debt. In light of the legal position that acknowledgment in writing can extend limitation, the Section 7 application could not be treated as time-barred.
Conclusion: The limitation objection was rejected and the Section 7 application was held to be within time, in favour of the respondent.