TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee wins tax treatment case: lease rentals, supplier credits, and TDS exemptions clarified.</h1> <h3>M/s. InterGlobe Aviation Ltd. Versus JCIT, Special Range : 4, New Delhi. And (Vice-Versa)</h3> M/s. InterGlobe Aviation Ltd. Versus JCIT, Special Range : 4, New Delhi. And (Vice-Versa) - TMI Issues Involved:1. Jurisdiction of CIT(A)2. Disallowance under Section 37(1) of Lease Rental Payments3. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for Supplementary Rent4. Taxability of Supplier Credits5. Additional Ground on Capital GainsIssue-wise Analysis:1. Jurisdiction of CIT(A):- The assessee argued that the CIT(A) erred in assuming jurisdiction to adjudicate issues not forming part of the grounds of appeal.- The Tribunal did not specifically dwell on this issue, indicating that the primary focus was on substantive tax matters rather than procedural jurisdictional issues.2. Disallowance under Section 37(1) of Lease Rental Payments:- The CIT(A) upheld an ad-hoc disallowance under Section 37(1) for lease rental payments, considering them capital in nature due to amortized credits.- The Tribunal, following the Special Bench decision for AY 2012-13, reversed the CIT(A)'s decision, holding that the lease rental payments are not capital expenditures and thus allowable under Section 37(1).3. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for Supplementary Rent:- The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance of supplementary rent under Section 40(a)(i) due to non-deduction of TDS.- For agreements executed before 01 April 2007, the Tribunal held that such payments are exempt under Section 10(15A) and thus not liable for TDS, following the Special Bench decision.- For agreements executed after 01 April 2007, the Tribunal applied Article 12 of the DTAA between India and Ireland, concluding that supplementary rent is not taxable in India, thus no TDS is required.4. Taxability of Supplier Credits:- The CIT(A) treated supplier credits as capital receipts, not revenue receipts, following earlier Tribunal decisions.- The Tribunal reaffirmed this, holding supplier credits as capital receipts, not taxable as revenue income under Section 28(iv).5. Additional Ground on Capital Gains:- The AO raised an additional ground that if supplier credits are capital receipts, they should be taxed as capital gains.- The Tribunal, following the Special Bench decision, held that there is no sale consideration received by the assessee for the transfer of capital assets, thus no capital gains tax is applicable.Separate Judgments by Judges:- The judgment does not indicate separate judgments by the judges, implying a unanimous decision by the bench.Summary:The Tribunal addressed multiple issues regarding the tax treatment of lease rental payments, supplementary rent, and supplier credits. It consistently followed the precedent set by the Special Bench for AY 2012-13, providing detailed reasoning for each issue. The Tribunal concluded that lease rental payments are allowable under Section 37(1), supplementary rent is not subject to TDS under Section 40(a)(i) due to DTAA provisions, and supplier credits are capital receipts not taxable under Section 28(iv) or as capital gains. The decisions were unanimous, reflecting a coherent application of legal principles and precedents.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
