Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cancellation of GST registration and the appellate affirmation were vitiated for want of a proper show cause notice and denial of opportunity of hearing under the U.P. GST Act and Rules.
Analysis: The notice for cancellation did not specify the date and time for personal hearing as contemplated by the prescribed format under Rule 22(1) of the U.P. GST Rules, 2017. The record also showed that the petitioner's assertion that no hearing was afforded was not met in the counter affidavit. The first proviso to Section 29(2) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 makes an opportunity of hearing mandatory before cancellation of registration, and the procedural requirement had to be followed strictly. The reliance on Section 29(1) was misplaced because the facts of the case did not fall within the situations covered by that provision. The appellate order also failed to independently deal with the challenge and merely repeated the cancellation reasons.
Conclusion: The cancellation proceedings were vitiated by breach of the statutory requirement of hearing, and the cancellation and appellate orders were liable to be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute expressly requires a pre-cancellation opportunity of hearing, non-compliance with that mandatory safeguard invalidates the cancellation of registration.