TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Company Petition Withdrawn Under IBC Section 60(5) - Compliance and Maintainability Key</h1> <h3>Thankam Cashew Factory Versus Royals International Trade and Allied Products Private Limited</h3> Thankam Cashew Factory Versus Royals International Trade and Allied Products Private Limited - TMI Issues Involved:Withdrawal of Company Petition under Section 60(5) of IBC, 2016 based on maintainability concerns raised by Respondent/Corporate Debtor.Analysis:Issue 1: Withdrawal of Company Petition under Section 60(5) of IBC, 2016The case involved an application filed by M/s. Thankam Cashew Factory seeking withdrawal of the Company Petition (CP(IB)/03/KOB/2021) under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Operational Creditor, represented by a Power of Attorney Holder, cited merit in the Respondent/Corporate Debtor's contention regarding the maintainability of the petition. The Respondent had raised objections related to the nature of the petitioner being a proprietary concern and the authority of a Power of Attorney Holder to represent an Operational Creditor in such proceedings.Issue 2: Compliance with Procedural RequirementsDuring the proceedings, the Operational Creditor failed to initially produce proof of payment of costs amounting to Rs. 25,000 within the stipulated timeline. Subsequently, the Operational Creditor filed another application (IA(IBC)/132/KOB/2021) to condone the delay in depositing the costs, enclosing proof of payment made through Bharatkosh. The Tribunal allowed the application to condone the delay, considering the compliance with the payment requirement.Issue 3: Final Decision and OrderUpon reviewing the pleadings and considering the compliance with the procedural requirements, the Tribunal, in its order dated October 6, 2021, allowed the withdrawal of the Company Petition (CP(IB)/03/KOB/2021). The Tribunal emphasized that the Applicant had fulfilled the conditions set forth, including the payment of costs, leading to the allowance of the withdrawal application.In conclusion, the Tribunal granted the withdrawal of the Company Petition based on the Operational Creditor's application under Section 60(5) of the IBC, 2016, after addressing the maintainability concerns raised by the Respondent/Corporate Debtor. The compliance with procedural requirements, particularly the payment of costs, played a crucial role in the final decision to allow the withdrawal of the petition.
TaxTMI 