Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether employees' contribution to ESI and provident fund, paid after the due date under the respective welfare laws but before the due date for filing the return, is allowable as deduction and whether the resulting disallowance could be sustained.
Analysis: The appeals concerned disallowance of employees' share of ESI and PF. The Tribunal noted that the controversy on the interaction between section 36(1)(va) and section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 had been considered in divergent judicial views, but preferred the line of authority favouring the assessee. It relied on the principle that where two reasonable constructions of a taxing provision are possible, the construction beneficial to the assessee should be adopted. The Tribunal also followed its earlier coordinate-bench view that if the employees' contribution is deposited on or before the due date for furnishing the return under section 139(1), no disallowance is warranted.
Conclusion: The disallowance of employees' contribution to ESI and PF was not sustainable, and the addition was directed to be deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Employees' contribution to welfare funds, if deposited on or before the due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1), cannot be disallowed merely because the payment was made after the due date under the relevant welfare statutes.