Tribunal rules on corporate guarantees, sponsorship fees & ESI/PF contributions

The tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals (ITA Nos.595/Hyd/2020 and 596/Hyd/2020). It confirmed the Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustment for corporate guarantees and the disallowance of sponsorship fees. However, it deleted the disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 43B for ESI/PF contributions. The tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decisions on the ALP adjustment and sponsorship fees disallowance, while ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the ESI/PF contributions disallowance.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustment for corporate guarantee.
2. Disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 43B for ESI/PF contributions.
3. Disallowance of sponsorship fees under Section 37(1).

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Arm's Length Price (ALP) Adjustment for Corporate Guarantee:
The primary issue in the assessment year 2016-17's appeal (ITA No.595/Hyd/2020) was the correctness of the lower authorities' action in making an ALP adjustment of Rs. 29,68,60,000/- concerning corporate guarantee involving its overseas Associated Enterprises (AEs). The tribunal referred to its earlier decisions in similar cases (ITA Nos.1719/Hyd/2016, 435/Hyd/2018 & 2154/Hyd/2018) for preceding assessment years (AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15), where it upheld an identical adjustment. The tribunal cited the Madras High Court's decision in PCIT Vs. M/s. Redington (India) Limited, which clarified that corporate guarantees are considered international transactions under Section 92B of the Act with retrospective effect. The tribunal concluded that the lower authorities correctly treated the assessee's corporate guarantees as international transactions and upheld the adjustment. The assessee's arguments were declined as no legal or factual distinction was pointed out.

2. Disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 43B for ESI/PF Contributions:
The assessee's second substantive grievance in AY 2016-17 and the former substantive ground in AY 2017-18 challenged the correctness of the lower authorities' action in invoking Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 43B for disallowance of Rs. 14,14,41,324/- and Rs. 3,42,98,657/- respectively. The tribunal noted that the assessee had deposited the employees' contributions before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1). The lower authorities' case was based on the premise that the employees' contribution is covered under Section 36(1)(va) rather than Section 43B. However, the tribunal observed that the legislature had amended Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B via the Finance Act, 2021, with the CBDT clarifying that these amendments apply prospectively from 01-04-2021. Therefore, the tribunal held that the impugned disallowance was not sustainable and deleted the ESI/PF disallowance in view of the latest legislative developments. The assessee succeeded on this issue in both appeals.

3. Disallowance of Sponsorship Fees under Section 37(1):
The third issue involved the disallowance of sponsorship fees of Rs. 17,30,400/- each in both assessment years. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, stating that the expenditure incurred towards sponsorship fees was in the nature of charity and not a business expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business. The assessee argued that the sponsorship was linked to its business activities in Uttar Pradesh, where it operated multiple projects and employed women. However, the tribunal found no merit in the assessee's grievance, as it failed to establish a direct nexus between the expenditure and its business activities. Citing the Third Member's decision in ITA No.2157/MAS/2011, M/s. Hyundai Motors India Ltd. Vs. DCIT, and the Supreme Court's decision in Sassoon J. David and Company (P) Ltd [118 ITR 26] (SC), the tribunal held that the expenditure claim under Section 37 must be wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the disallowance made by the lower authorities.

Conclusion:
The assessee's appeals (ITA Nos.595/Hyd/2020 and 596/Hyd/2020) were partly allowed. The tribunal confirmed the ALP adjustment for corporate guarantees and the disallowance of sponsorship fees, while it deleted the disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 43B for ESI/PF contributions. The order was pronounced in the open court on 27th September 2021.

---