Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a direction was required for issuance of a detention certificate enabling waiver of demurrage charges for the imported goods.
Analysis: The relief sought was consequential to the earlier proceedings concerning release of the imported consignment and the request for one-time relaxation under Article 14 of the Plant Quarantine (Regulations of Import into India) Order, 2003. The respondent stated that the earlier directions had been complied with, that a written opinion had already been rendered, and that the competent customs officer had been moved by communication to pass orders for issuance of the detention certificate and waiver of demurrage charges. In view of this development, the Court found it unnecessary to issue a fresh mandamus.
Conclusion: The request for a further direction was not separately adjudicated, and the matter was disposed of on the basis that the competent authority would act on the existing communication and pass the necessary orders within a short time.
Final Conclusion: The petition was disposed of by recording the respondent's statement that the consequential relief sought by the petitioner would be processed by the competent authority.
Ratio Decidendi: When the competent authority has already been moved to grant the consequential relief sought, a fresh writ direction may be declined and the petition disposed of by recording the development.