Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received by the assessee from a third party on cancellation of a supply contract was includible in the transaction value of the excisable goods for purposes of central excise duty.
Analysis: The valuation scheme under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 proceeds on the basis of transaction value, meaning the price actually paid or payable for the goods, together with any additional amount payable to the assessee by reason of, or in connection with, the sale. Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 also brings within valuation additional consideration flowing directly or indirectly from the buyer. On the facts found, the amount received from Honda India was not treated as a detached compensation payment; it was held to be part of the business arrangement connected with the very goods manufactured for that supply chain, and the amount was regarded as having flowed indirectly from the buyers of the goods.
Conclusion: The amount was includible in the transaction value and central excise duty was payable on it; the challenge to the demand failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a payment received from a third party is found, on the facts, to be part of the consideration for the goods and to have an indirect nexus with their sale, it forms part of the transaction value for central excise valuation.