Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants exemption for reinvestment, emphasizes procedural fairness</h1> <h3>The Ceylon Pentecostal Mission Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (CPC), Bangalore.</h3> The Ceylon Pentecostal Mission Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (CPC), Bangalore. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Adjustment of Capital Gain on Sale of Property.2. Disallowance of Accumulation of Income under Section 11(2) due to Non-filing of Form 10.3. Procedural Lapses and Technical Glitches in Filing Form 10.4. Legality of Adjustments under Section 143(1) Intimation.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Adjustment of Capital Gain on Sale of Property:The assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 21,48,579/- as capital gain by the Assessing Officer (AO) while processing the return under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee claimed exemption under Section 11(1A) by reinvesting the sale consideration in acquiring another capital asset for charitable purposes. The Tribunal noted that the AO, without examining the details, made adjustments towards capital gains. The Tribunal held that once the assessee reinvested the sale consideration for acquiring another capital asset, the entire capital gain is exempt under Section 11(1A). Therefore, the AO and the CIT(A) erred in not considering the detailed reasons provided by the assessee for claiming exemption from capital gain. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the exemption claimed under Section 11(1A).2. Disallowance of Accumulation of Income under Section 11(2) due to Non-filing of Form 10:The AO denied the accumulation of income under Section 11(2) amounting to Rs. 6,39,878/- due to the non-filing of Form 10 within the stipulated time. The assessee argued that although the income was accumulated and invested as per the provisions, Form 10 could not be uploaded due to technical glitches. The CIT(A) rejected this explanation, stating that without Form 10, the AO could not grant the benefit of accumulation under Section 11(2). The Tribunal, however, noted that the CIT(A) should have admitted Form 10 filed during the appellate proceedings since the appeal is a continuation of the original proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) should have considered the issue without focusing on procedural lapses, given that the assessee had complied with the substantive requirements of Section 11(2).3. Procedural Lapses and Technical Glitches in Filing Form 10:The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's claim that Form 10 could not be uploaded due to technical glitches in the web portal. The assessee provided evidence of the resolution and investment in specified assets. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) should have considered these factors and allowed the accumulation of income under Section 11(2). The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in Chandraprabhuji Maharaj Jain Vs. DCIT, which emphasized examining the admissibility of statutory benefits rather than focusing on technicalities.4. Legality of Adjustments under Section 143(1) Intimation:The Tribunal reiterated that an intimation under Section 143(1) is not a regular assessment. Adjustments under Section 143(1) are limited to prima-facie adjustments based on the return filed by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that no intimation was given to the assessee before making adjustments towards capital gains and accumulation of income under Section 11(2). Therefore, the adjustments made by the AO were not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellate authority has co-terminus and co-extensive powers with the AO and should have admitted Form 10 filed by the assessee during the appellate proceedings.Conclusion:The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the CIT(A) and restored the issue to the file of the AO. The AO was directed to allow the benefit of accumulation of income under Section 11(2) by considering Form 10 filed by the assessee along with other evidences. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the stay petition was dismissed as infructuous.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found