Defence access to income tax records and witness recall may be used to ensure a fair trial in cheque dishonour cases.

In a prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the criminal procedure powers under Sections 91 and 311 may be used to secure defence material and, where necessary, recall a witness if the evidence is essential to a fair decision. The document notes that the accused sought the complainant's income tax returns and annexures to test lending capacity, and that refusal to produce relevant tax records could prejudice the defence. It also states that consideration of recall under Section 311 may be deferred until the response to the summons under Section 91 is received.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applications to summon the complainant's income tax returns under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and to recall the complainant under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 could be rejected in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 after the evidence of the parties had been completed.

Analysis: Proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 are generally tried summarily under Section 143 of that Act, with the procedure of summons cases under Sections 262 and 254 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applying as far as may be. The power under Section 91 of the Code is available to secure documents relevant to the defence, and Section 311 confers power to summon or recall witnesses at any stage where the evidence is essential for a just decision. The accused had sought the complainant's income tax returns and related annexures to test the complainant's lending capacity in a case involving a large monetary claim. In such circumstances, refusal to permit production of the relevant tax records would prejudice the defence and affect the fairness of the trial. The request to recall the complainant under Section 311 was held to be premature until the income tax authorities responded to the summons under Section 91.

Conclusion: The rejection of the application under Section 91 was unsustainable to the extent it sought the complainant's income tax returns and annexures, and the matter under Section 311 was to be considered after the response to the summons. The relief was granted in part in favour of the petitioner.

Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside to a limited extent, the accused was permitted to seek production of the relevant income tax records, and further consideration of recall of the complainant was deferred pending the response to summons.

Ratio Decidendi: In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the court may invoke Sections 91 and 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to secure relevant defence material and recall a witness at an appropriate stage where refusal would impair fair trial, even after evidence has been recorded.

---