TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court grants time for instructions, leading to adjourned admission; petitioner seeks prompt disposal directive.</h1> <h3>M/s. Vivasvan International Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (EDC) Chennai IV Commissionerate, Chennai</h3> M/s. Vivasvan International Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (EDC) Chennai IV Commissionerate, Chennai - TMI Issues:1. Request for time by respondent's counsel2. Reference to previous court orders and intracourt appeal3. Technical glitch delaying proceedings4. Abridged prayer by writ petitioner's counsel5. Directive for disposal of writ petitioner's representationAnalysis:1. The respondent's counsel requested time in the proceedings on 03.09.2021, which was granted for further instructions, leading to an adjourned admission on 13.09.2021.2. On 13.09.2021, the writ petitioner's counsel referred to an order in a previous case and mentioned an intracourt appeal, highlighting similar orders by other High Courts. Hard copies of judgments were to be presented in the next listing on 15.09.2021.3. Technical issues arose on 15.09.2021, causing a delay, but both counsels were present, and the main writ petition was taken up with their consent.4. The writ petitioner's counsel decided to abridge the prayer, seeking a directive for the respondent to dispose of the representation within a specified timeframe. The court accepted this request due to its simplicity and issued a directive accordingly.5. The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent to handle the writ petitioner's representation promptly and in accordance with the law, setting a deadline for disposal. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the case's merits and left the decision of a personal hearing to the respondent's discretion. No costs were awarded in the judgment.
TaxTMI 