Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the petitioner's declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 was justified on the ground that the appeal was not pending as on the specified date because the delay in filing the appeal had not been formally condoned.
Analysis: The petitioner had filed an appeal with an application for condonation of delay, and the appellate authority subsequently called for ground-wise written submissions, which indicated that the appeal was being treated as admitted for consideration. The scheme treated pending appeals as eligible for declaration, and the CBDT circular clarified that where a delayed appeal accompanied by an application for condonation had been filed before the circular date and was admitted before the declaration, it would be deemed pending as on the specified date. The expression "pending" was understood to cover an appeal from the time of filing until disposal, and not only after formal admission.
Conclusion: The rejection was held to be untenable, the petitioner's declaration was held to be maintainable under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and the authorities were directed to process the petitioner's forms.