Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (9) TMI 940 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court upholds validity of Income Tax Act notices issued during pandemic, dismisses challenge The court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act on 25.06.2021 and 30.06.2021. The ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court upholds validity of Income Tax Act notices issued during pandemic, dismisses challenge

                            The court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act on 25.06.2021 and 30.06.2021. The court held that the notices were valid as they were issued within the extended time limits provided by notifications from the Ministry of Finance due to the pandemic. The court deemed the extension of time limits as a lawful exercise of delegated legislative power, affirming the legality of the notices in question.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Applicability of Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            3. Impact of the Finance Act, 2021 and subsequent notifications on the issuance of notice under Section 148.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of Notice Issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

                            The petitioner challenged the notices dated 25.06.2021 and 30.06.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner argued that these notices were invalid as they were issued without following the procedure outlined in Section 148A, which came into effect on 01.04.2021. The petitioner contended that the Assessing Officer was required to conduct an enquiry and provide an opportunity for a hearing before issuing the notice, as mandated by Section 148A.

                            2. Applicability of Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

                            The petitioner asserted that the amended Finance Act, 2021, which introduced Section 148A, required the Assessing Officer to conduct an enquiry with the prior approval of the specified authority and issue a detailed show cause notice before issuing a notice under Section 148. Since the notices in question were issued after the effective date of the amendment (01.04.2021), the petitioner argued that they were illegal and contrary to the provisions of Section 148A.

                            3. Impact of the Finance Act, 2021 and Subsequent Notifications on the Issuance of Notice under Section 148:

                            The respondents argued that due to the pandemic and lockdown, the Ministry of Finance had issued notifications extending the applicability of the old provisions of Section 148. These notifications extended the time limits for issuing notices under Section 148 until 30.06.2021. The respondents contended that the notices issued on 25.06.2021 and 30.06.2021 were within the extended time limits and were therefore valid and legal.

                            The court examined the relevant notifications issued by the Ministry of Finance, which extended the time limits for issuing notices under Section 148 due to the pandemic. The notifications dated 31.03.2021 and 27.04.2021 extended the applicability of the old provisions of Section 148 until 30.06.2021. The court noted that these extensions were made under the Taxation & Others Laws (Relaxation & Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, which allowed the Central Government to extend time limits specified under the Income Tax Act.

                            The court held that the notifications issued by the Ministry of Finance were a form of conditional legislation, which allowed the executive to extend the applicability of the old provisions of Section 148 in light of the pandemic. The court found that this delegation of power to the Ministry of Finance was valid and did not amount to an abdication of legislative power. The court concluded that the notices issued on 25.06.2021 and 30.06.2021 were within the extended time limits and were therefore valid.

                            Conclusion:

                            The court dismissed the petition, holding that the notices issued under Section 148 on 25.06.2021 and 30.06.2021 were valid and legal, as they were issued within the extended time limits provided by the notifications issued by the Ministry of Finance. The court found that the extension of time limits was a valid exercise of delegated legislative power in response to the pandemic and lockdown.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found