Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the balance receipts not attributable to the permanent establishment were taxable as fees for technical services under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA, including application of the make available principle.
Analysis: The issue was treated as identical to the assessee's own earlier years, with no distinguishing facts brought on record for the year under consideration. Following the coordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for the earlier assessment years, the Tribunal declined to take a different view. The receipts in question were therefore considered in the same manner as in the earlier years, with the treaty provisions on fees for technical services and the make available requirement governing the characterization exercise.
Conclusion: The receipts were held taxable as fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA, and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the material facts are identical to earlier assessment years and no distinguishing feature is shown, the Tribunal may follow its prior decision and uphold taxation of the receipts under the applicable treaty article governing fees for technical services.