Court grants MEIS benefit despite marking error; emphasizes exporter intent.

The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the Policy Relaxation Committee's decision and directing authorities to grant the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) benefit for the disputed shipping bill. The judgment emphasized the importance of exporters' clear intent despite marking errors, ensuring fairness and consistency in applying MEIS rules. The relief granted aligned with past judgments, highlighting that inadvertent mistakes in marking 'Y' or 'N' should not deprive eligible exporters of benefits as long as intent is evident. The petitioner was directed to claim the benefit within a specified timeframe, with no costs awarded.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to orders declining reward claim under MEIS for a shipping bill, interpretation of FTP provisions, requirement of marking intent in shipping bill, impact of inadvertent error in marking 'Y' or 'N', reliance on previous judgments for similar cases.

Detailed Analysis:

1. The challenge in the petition was against the orders declining to allow the claim for reward under MEIS for a specific shipping bill due to the inadvertent marking of 'N' instead of 'Y'. The petitioner exported ferro alloys and held a valid importer exporter code.

2. The Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) contains provisions for Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) and Service Exports from India Scheme (SEIS) to provide rewards to exporters. Duty Credit Scrips (DCS) are granted under MEIS, and exporters must declare intent in the shipping bill to claim rewards.

3. The petitioner exported to South Korea under a shipping bill eligible for MEIS reward. Despite indicating the intent to claim the reward on the shipping bill, an inadvertent error led to marking 'N' instead of 'Y', causing the claim denial.

4. The petitioner sought relaxation from the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) due to the error, citing difficulties faced by exporters in similar situations. Previous judgments from Kerala, Madras, and Bombay High Courts supported extending benefits for inadvertent errors in marking 'Y' or 'N' in shipping bills.

5. The court found merit in the petitioner's argument, aligning with the past judgments that emphasized the exporter's clear intent despite marking errors. The court set aside the PRC's decision and directed the authorities to allow the MEIS benefit for the disputed shipping bill.

6. The judgment highlighted the procedural nature of the error and the fundamental objective of MEIS to reward exporters. It emphasized that inadvertent mistakes in marking 'Y' or 'N' should not deprive eligible exporters of benefits, as long as the intent is evident from other details.

7. The court's decision was based on ensuring fairness and consistency in applying MEIS rules, considering the exporter's genuine intent and the technical nature of the error. The relief granted to the petitioner was in line with the principles established in previous judgments.

8. Ultimately, the court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the PRC's decision and directing the authorities to issue the necessary certificate for the petitioner to claim the MEIS benefit for the disputed shipping bill within a specified timeframe. No costs were awarded in the case.

---