Failure to Address Office Objections Promptly Leads to Dismissal

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to address office objections promptly. The court expressed concern over the significant delay in compliance and the lack of explanation for non-compliance. The appellant was directed to submit a further affidavit explaining the delays and serve a copy to the respondent. A deadline was set for submission, and the respondent was given the opportunity to respond. The court scheduled a hearing to address the issues promptly, emphasizing the importance of complying with court orders for the efficient administration of justice.

---

---

Issues: Failure to remove office objections leading to dismissal of appeal, delay in filing further affidavit, need for explanation regarding non-compliance with court orders.

The judgment by the Bombay High Court pertains to a case where the appellant failed to remove office objections as directed by the court, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The court noted the significant delay in compliance, with the matter being listed almost one and a half years later without any action taken. Despite the dismissal, the appellant only filed an application in 2020, citing "inadvertence" as the reason for the delay. The court expressed concern over the lack of a proper explanation for the non-compliance with the court's orders and the delayed realization of the dismissal.

The court directed the appellant to file a further affidavit explaining the reasons behind the failure to remove office objections within the specified time frame and the absence of any action on the scheduled date. Additionally, the appellant was required to clarify the substantial delay in filing the application and how they only became aware of the dismissal after four years. The court set a deadline for the submission of the further affidavit and mandated that a copy be served to the respondent within two weeks. The respondent was also given the opportunity to file a reply to the application and the additional affidavit within a week of receiving the documents.

Furthermore, the court scheduled the application for a hearing on 7th September 2021, indicating the importance of resolving the issues related to the non-compliance with court orders and the subsequent dismissal of the appeal. The judgment underscores the necessity for parties to adhere to court directives promptly and provide valid explanations for any delays or oversights in legal proceedings to ensure the efficient administration of justice.

---