Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under sections 8 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was maintainable and liable to be admitted, and whether section 10A barred the proceeding in view of the date of default.
Analysis: The debt and default were found to be established on the admitted correspondence and the record, and the corporate debtor did not effectively dispute the claim. The default occurred on 01.12.2019, which was prior to 25.03.2020, so the statutory bar under section 10A did not apply. The petition was also found to be complete in all respects, and the proposed insolvency professional was accepted for appointment as Interim Resolution Professional.
Conclusion: The application was held admissible and the corporate insolvency resolution process was ordered to commence against the corporate debtor.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded, CIRP was triggered, and moratorium-related consequences followed in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 10A does not bar a CIRP application where the default occurred before 25.03.2020, and once debt and default are established, an otherwise complete section 9 application is liable to be admitted.