Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Illegal Export of Red Sanders Disguised as Clutch Plates Leads to Penalties and Confiscation</h1> <h3>M/s Info Capital Logistic Co., M/s Blue Bell Logistics Pvt. Ltd., M/s CSB Logistics and M/s Cargo Specialist Inc. Versus Commissioner of Customs New Delhi</h3> The case involved mis-declaration and attempted export of prohibited red sanders disguised as clutch plates. Various freight forwarders and customs ... Smuggling of export goods - Red Sanders - prohibited goods or not - breach of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 - penalty on customs broker and agent of customs broker - HELD THAT:- The appellant M/s CSB Logistic (Custom Broker) was duty bound as a Custom Broker under the Regulation of 2014 to verify antecedents and genuineness of the importer exporter code, IEC number, identity of their client and functioning of their client at the declared address by using reliable, independent and authentic documents/ data/ information. As per the facts on record, the Custom Broker did not meet the exporter or the owner of the said Fashion World or the master mind Reyaz Ahmed alias Rajbir alias Dharmendra, the person who originated the goods for exporter, which were prohibited. Thus, their negligence have facilitated the mischievous exporter in attempting to export prohibited goods. Further, they have similarly facilitated the export of about eight consignments in the recent past and there is reasonable belief that such consignments also had prohibited goods. Other three appellants (other than custom broker/agent of customs broker) - HELD THAT:- The other three appellants are freight forwarder, evidently they have acted as the facilitator of export of prohibited goods. They have acted as an agent of the Custom Broker –M/s CSB Logistics, directly or indirectly. Thus, these three appellants were also duty bound to observe the KYC norms and to assist the Custom Broker in complying with his obligation under Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2013. Penalty - HELD THAT:- As per the evidence on record, these appellants have not made any profit and/or participated in any profit in the export of prohibited goods. Rather these persons have acted on normal remuneration basis as a freight forwarder - appeal allowed in part by reducing the quantum of penalty. Appeal allowed in part. Issues Involved:1. Mis-declaration and attempted export of prohibited goods (red sanders) under the guise of clutch plates.2. Involvement and negligence of various freight forwarders and customs brokers in the export process.3. Violation of Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Act provisions.4. Imposition of penalties on the involved parties.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Mis-declaration and Attempted Export of Prohibited Goods:The case involved the export of prohibited red sanders under the guise of clutch plates. M/s Fashion World, through its Customs Broker M/s CSB Logistics, declared the goods as clutch plates. Upon examination, only 80 clutch plates were found, and the rest were red sanders, whose export is prohibited. The goods were seized by Customs.2. Involvement and Negligence of Various Freight Forwarders and Customs Brokers:The investigation revealed a chain of freight forwarders and customs brokers involved in the export process without proper verification of the exporter or the consignment. M/s Cargo Specialist Inc. handed over the consignment to M/s Info Capital Logistic Ltd., which further forwarded it to M/s Blue Bell Logistics, who then handed it over to M/s CSB Logistics for customs clearance. None of these entities verified the genuineness of the exporter or the documents. Statements from involved parties indicated a lack of due diligence and compliance with KYC norms, facilitating the attempted export of prohibited goods.3. Violation of Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Act Provisions:The Revenue noted breaches of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 and violations of the Customs Act under Sections 50(2), 110, and 113(d). The export of wood and wood products, including red sanders, is prohibited. The appellants were found to have violated shipping bill regulations and Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations (CHALR), 2004, making them liable for penalties. The red sanders and the goods used to conceal them were liable for confiscation.4. Imposition of Penalties on the Involved Parties:The Additional Commissioner issued a show cause notice proposing to confiscate the seized goods and impose penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act. The seized red sanders (1004 kg) were valued at Rs. 10,04,000/- and were absolutely confiscated under Section 113(d), (h), and (i) of the Customs Act. The clutch plates were also confiscated under Section 119. Penalties were imposed on the involved parties as follows:- M/s Fashion World: Rs. 10,00,000/-- M/s CSB Logistics: Rs. 8,00,000/-- M/s Cargo Specialist Inc.: Rs. 8,00,000/-- M/s Info Capital Logistic Co.: Rs. 3,00,000/-- M/s Blue Bell Logistics Pvt. Limited: Rs. 8,00,000/-Appeals and Tribunal's Decision:The appellants contested the penalties, arguing a lack of knowledge of the prohibited nature of the goods and compliance with KYC norms. The Tribunal found that M/s CSB Logistics failed to verify the antecedents of the exporter, facilitating the export of prohibited goods. However, the other appellants acted on normal remuneration basis without participating in profits from the prohibited goods. The Tribunal reduced the penalties as follows:- M/s CSB Logistics: Reduced to Rs. 1,00,000/-- M/s Cargo Specialist Inc.: Reduced to Rs. 80,000/-- M/s Info Capital Logistic Co.: Reduced to Rs. 30,000/-- M/s Blue Bell Logistics Pvt. Limited: Reduced to Rs. 50,000/-Conclusion:The appeals were partly allowed, with penalties reduced for the freight forwarders while maintaining the penalty for the customs broker due to their negligence in verifying the exporter’s credentials. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due diligence and compliance with regulations to prevent the export of prohibited goods.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found