Refund claims on freight and packing charges require merits review; non-speaking appellate orders cannot be sustained.

Refund claims for duty paid on freight and packing charges cannot be rejected merely because the approved price-lists were not previously appealed. The authorities must examine the claim on its merits and also consider whether it was filed within the prescribed limitation period. A non-speaking appellate order that does not address the merits or the refund grounds is not sustainable as a reasoned decision. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the rejection of the refund claim solely because no appeal had been filed against the approved price-lists was justified, and whether the appellate order, being non-speaking and not addressing the merits, could be sustained.

Analysis: The claim for refund of duty paid on freight and packing charges was not barred merely because the approved price-lists had not been challenged earlier. The lower authorities did not examine the merits of the refund claim or consider whether it was within the prescribed time limit. The appellate order also failed to discuss the claim on merits and therefore could not stand as a reasoned decision.

Outcome: The order of the Appellate Collector was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration on merits.

---