Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Shock Dampened Front Buffer Push Plates and the Rear Dehitching Device fitted to a shunter were entitled to exclusion from duty as weight lifting or material handling equipment under the explanation to Tariff Item 34.
Analysis: The disputed items were found to be essential parts of a shunter and not equipment of the kind contemplated by the explanation to Tariff Item 34. The explanation covered motor vehicles fitted with weight lifting, earth-moving, or similar specialised material handling equipment, and the goods in question did not fall within that category. The comparison with a platform elevator was rejected because that item was treated as weight lifting equipment, whereas the present goods stood on a different footing.
Conclusion: The claim for exclusion failed and the revision application was rejected.