Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cotton and woollen felts manufactured by the petitioners were classifiable as cotton fabrics and woollen fabrics under Tariff Items 19 and 21, and whether earlier decisions treating non-woven felts as non-fabric applied to woven felts.
Analysis: Tariff Items 19 and 21 cover all varieties of fabrics manufactured wholly or partly from cotton or wholly of wool, and the scope of the entries was held to be wide enough to include woven materials irrespective of their end use. The earlier Supreme Court decision relied upon dealt with non-woven felts, and the principle stated there was that fabric means woven material; it did not govern the present case because the goods in question were admitted to be woven. The Punjab High Court decision concerned a different taxing entry under sales tax law and was not considered apposite for construing the excise tariff entry. The affidavits from traders were rejected as not showing that the goods ceased to be fabrics merely because they were specialized products and not garments or covering materials.
Conclusion: The cotton and woollen felts were held to be fabrics and were classifiable under Tariff Items 19 and 21 respectively, with the duty liability upheld against the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi: Woven textile products are fabrics within the tariff entries even when they are specialized goods and not used as garments or covering materials; the decisive test is whether the material is woven, not its end use.