Court rules in favor of Petitioners on Recovery Warrant payments exempt from TDS under Income Tax Act

The Court ruled in favor of the Petitioners, holding that the amounts payable under the Recovery Warrant and Consent Terms were compensatory and not subject to Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under the Income Tax Act. Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 were directed to pay the deducted TDS amount to the Petitioners and comply with the remaining payments without TDS deductions. The Court scheduled further consideration for the 6th installment on 25th August 2021.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Recovery of arrears under a Recovery Warrant dated 15th October 2018.
2. Deduction of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on the interest payable under the Recovery Warrant and Consent Terms.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Recovery of Arrears under Recovery Warrant:
The Petitioners entered into agreements with Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 for the purchase of flats between 2013 and 2016. Due to non-fulfillment of obligations by Respondent Nos. 4 to 7, a Recovery Warrant was issued by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority on 15th October 2018. Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 made part payments amounting to Rs. 1,80,00,000/-. Further, Consent Terms were agreed upon on 4th March 2021, where Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 undertook to pay Rs. 2,75,00,000/- with 10.05% interest in installments. The Court accepted these terms and ordered compliance.

2. Deduction of TDS on Interest Payable:
Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 deducted 10% TDS on the interest component of the July 2021 installment, which the Petitioners contested. The Petitioners argued that the amounts payable are compensatory and not liable for TDS under the Income Tax Act, 1961. They cited various judgments, including All India Reporter Ltd vs Ramchandra D Datar, and PCIT v West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation, to support their claim that the amounts are compensatory and hence outside the purview of Section 194A and Section 2(28A) of the Income Tax Act.

The Respondents initially defended the deduction under Section 194A but later agreed with the Petitioners' legal position, acknowledging that the interest payable is compensatory.

Court's Analysis and Judgment:
The Court examined the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, particularly Sections 192 to 195 and Sections 196A to 196D, focusing on Section 194A and the definition of "interest" under Section 2(28A). The Court referenced multiple judgments to conclude that the amounts payable are compensatory and do not establish a debtor-creditor relationship. Therefore, they are not subject to TDS under Section 194A.

Key Judgments Referenced:
- PCIT v West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation: Clarified that compensatory payments do not attract TDS.
- Beacon Projects (P) Ltd v CIT: Established that payments without a debtor-creditor relationship are not subject to TDS.
- All India Reporter Ltd vs Ramchandra D Datar: Held that judgment debts are not liable for TDS.
- Madhusudan Shrikrishna v Emkay Exports: Affirmed that court-ordered payments are not liable for TDS.

Final Order:
The Court directed Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 to pay the deducted amount of Rs. 5,05,989/- to the Petitioners within one week and to comply with the remaining payments without TDS deductions. The matter regarding the 6th installment was scheduled for further consideration on 25th August 2021.

---