Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim of Special Additional Duty was barred by limitation under the amended refund notification, and whether the limitation period had to be computed from the date of sale of the imported goods.
Analysis: The refund under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. was held to accrue only when the imported goods were sold and the statutory conditions for refund were satisfied. The imported goods had been substantially sold in December 2016, but the refund application was filed only in March 2018. Since the right to claim refund had arisen on sale, the assessee was required to apply within a reasonable time thereafter. The earlier Delhi High Court decisions were distinguished because, in those cases, the goods had not yet been sold and the refund right had not accrued. Here, the amended notification was held to be applicable and the delay remained unexplained.
Conclusion: The refund claim was rightly held to be barred by limitation, and the rejection of refund was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: In claims for refund of Special Additional Duty under the refund notification, the limitation period is computed from the date on which the imported goods are sold, because the right to refund accrues only on such sale.