1975 (11) TMI 48 - CGOVT - Central Excise

Classification of iron & steel products for Central Excise duty: 'bars' or 'flats'? Government decision.

The dispute in this case centered on the classification of iron and steel products as 'bars' or 'flats' for Central Excise duty assessment. M/s Upper ... Iron & Steel Products - Classification of excisable goods Issues:1. Classification of iron & steel products as 'bars' or 'flats' for Central Excise duty assessment.Comprehensive Analysis:1. The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of iron & steel products manufactured by M/s Upper India Steel Manufacturing and Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. The company contended that their products, namely rods and bars, should be classified as 'bars' under Tariff Item No. 26AA (ia) instead of 'flats' under Tariff Item No. 26AA (iii) as done by the Central Excise Department. They sought a refund of excise duty paid on these products amounting to Rs. 4,13,855.11 Paise.2. The Asstt. Collector of Central Excise, Ludhiana classified the products as 'flats' based on the trade perception that the products were known as 'flats' and not 'bars.' However, the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi disagreed and classified the products as 'bars' in line with existing instructions since 1963.3. The Central Government reviewed the case and noted that the Appellate Collector's decision was not correct. The Government emphasized that goods should be classified based on market nomenclature and commercial parlance. The company argued that their products were known as 'flat bars' in the market, not 'flats.' They cited the Central Excise Literature and Customs Tariff Guide to support their classification as 'bars.'4. The Government of India analyzed the dimensions and characteristics of the products in question. They observed that as per market conventions and commercial parlance, products with specific thickness and width were considered as 'flats.' They highlighted that Central Excise classification should align with market perception and accepted trade practices. The Government emphasized that the width being greater than the thickness was a crucial criterion for classification.5. In conclusion, exercising powers under section 36(2) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944, the Government of India set aside the Appellate Collector's order and directed that the goods should be assessed for Central Excise duty based on market nomenclature and commercial parlance, classifying them as 'flats' in accordance with the prevailing trade practices and dimensions of the products.