TDS on salaries to nuns and priests upheld: religious status, past practice, and circulars cannot override the Income-tax Act.
Section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 requires tax deduction at source from salary income, and the obligation depends on the character of the payment, not on the recipient's religious status or later use of the money; salaries paid to nuns and priests in educational institutions were therefore subject to TDS. The doctrine of diversion of income by overriding title did not apply because the salary first reached the recipient and was only thereafter applied under personal or ecclesiastical obligations. CBDT circulars could not create an exemption contrary to the statute, Article 25 was not infringed by lawful tax deduction, and long-standing non-deduction created no enforceable right against the statutory mandate.
Issues: (i) whether salaries paid to nuns and priests employed in educational institutions were liable for tax deduction at source; (ii) whether the principle of diversion of income by overriding title applied to such salaries; (iii) whether the CBDT circulars of 1944 and 1977 exempted such salaries from tax deduction at source; (iv) whether deduction of tax at source violated Article 25 of the Constitution of India; and (v) whether long non-deduction of tax created a right against deduction.
Issue (i): whether salaries paid to nuns and priests employed in educational institutions were liable for tax deduction at source.
Analysis: Section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 obliges the payer to deduct tax at source from income chargeable under the head 'Salaries'. The statutory duty depends on the character of the payment as salary and not on the recipient's vocation, religious status, or subsequent use of the money. Chargeability and the mechanics of deduction are governed by the Act, and the payer is not required to examine the recipient's personal law or how the recipient applies the income after receipt.
Conclusion: Salaries paid to nuns and priests are liable for tax deduction at source.
Issue (ii): whether the principle of diversion of income by overriding title applied to such salaries.
Analysis: The doctrine applies only where, by reason of an overriding obligation, the income never reaches the assessee as income. If the income reaches the assessee and is thereafter applied in a particular manner, the case is one of application of income. The claim based on canon law and the vow of poverty did not create a statutory diversion before receipt of salary. Personal or ecclesiastical law cannot override the taxing statute, and the concept of civil death has no place under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The principle of diversion of income by overriding title does not apply to the salaries in question.
Issue (iii): whether the CBDT circulars of 1944 and 1977 exempted such salaries from tax deduction at source.
Analysis: The circulars dealt with missionaries' fees and similar earnings and could not be extended to salaries paid by the Government or aided institutions to nuns or priests. The Board's power under Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is confined to proper administration of the Act and cannot be used to create an exemption contrary to the statute. A circular cannot override the charging and deduction provisions of the Act.
Conclusion: The circulars did not exempt the salaries of nuns or priests from tax deduction at source.
Issue (iv): whether deduction of tax at source violated Article 25 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The right to profess, practice and propagate religion is subject to public order and the law of the land. A valid tax law and compliance with it do not infringe Article 25 merely because the assessee belongs to a religious congregation.
Conclusion: Deduction of tax at source does not violate Article 25 of the Constitution of India.
Issue (v): whether long non-deduction of tax created a right against deduction.
Analysis: A practice contrary to law cannot mature into a legal right. There can be no estoppel against statute, and past omission by the administration does not defeat the statutory mandate under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: Long non-deduction did not create any enforceable right against deduction of tax at source.
Final Conclusion: The statutory scheme required tax deduction at source from the salaries in question, and the contrary claims based on canon law, circulars, constitutional freedom of religion, and past practice were rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where salary is chargeable under the head 'Salaries', Section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 mandates deduction at source irrespective of the recipient's religious status, the subsequent application of the income, or any administrative practice inconsistent with the statute.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
