Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transportation, special packing, loading and unloading charges realised separately after manufacture could be included in the assessable value for central excise duty under the unamended Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and whether the show cause notice seeking duty on such amounts was without jurisdiction.
Analysis: Under the unamended Section 4, excise value was to be determined with reference to the wholesale cash price at the time of removal, subject only to permissible deductions such as trade discount and duty. The charges in question were collected through separate bills after manufacture and were not part of the manufacturing process or manufacturing profit. They were post-manufacturing expenses and, on the reasoning accepted from the line of authorities considered, could not be included in the assessable value for levy of duty. On that footing, the notice seeking to treat those amounts as part of the assessable value could not stand.
Conclusion: The charges were not includible in the assessable value under the unamended Section 4, and the impugned show cause notice was without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: For the unamended Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, only the value attributable to manufacture forms part of the assessable value, and post-manufacturing charges such as separate transportation and packing expenses are excludible.