Applicant's Effluent Treatment Model Classified as Sale of Goods

The ruling determined that the applicant's proposed model of purchasing raw effluent, treating it, and selling the resultant products classifies the outputs as the sale of goods. The recovered water is correctly classified under CTH 2201 as waters described under Sl.No.24 of Annexure-III of Notification No. 01/2017-C.T. (Rate). The questions regarding the classification of the raw effluent and the method of arriving at its value were not addressed as they fall outside the scope of an advance ruling for the applicant as a recipient of the goods.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Classification of the supply of outputs as sale of goods.
2. Classification of water sold under Heading 2201.
3. Classification of effluent purchased from dyeing as other wastes from chemical or allied industries (3825 69 00).
4. Method of arriving value for effluent using the net realization price method.

Issue-wise Analysis:

1. Classification of the Supply of Outputs as Sale of Goods:
The applicant, a Common Effluent Treatment Plant, intends to change its operational model from providing treatment services to purchasing raw effluent, treating it, and selling the resultant products. The proposed model involves treating the raw effluent received from member dyeing units and extracting products such as R.O. Water, Sodium Sulphate (Glauber Salt), Brine Solution, and Sodium Chloride (Mixed Salt). The ruling determined that in this new modus operandi, the classification of the supply of outputs as sale of goods is correct. This is because the applicant will be treating the effluent on their own account and selling the resultant products at market rates, indicating a sale of goods rather than a service.

2. Classification of Water Sold Under Heading 2201:
The applicant proposed to classify the recovered water under Heading 2201 as "Water (other than aerated, mineral, purified, distilled, medicinal, ionic, battery, de-mineralized and water sold in sealed container)." The analysis of the recovered water, which is partly de-mineralized and sold for industrial use, revealed that it does not fit the description under Sl.No.99 of Notification No. 02/2017-C.T. (Rate). Instead, it falls under Sl.No. 24 of Annexure-III of Notification No. 01/2017-C.T. (Rate), which includes waters not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter and not flavored. Therefore, the classification of the water recovered as de-mineralized water for industrial use under CTH 2201 is correct under the specified notification.

3. Classification of Effluent Purchased from Dyeing as Other Wastes from Chemical or Allied Industries (3825 69 00):
The ruling did not address the classification of the effluent purchased from dyeing units under HSN 3825 69 00. It was noted that the applicant sought this ruling as a recipient of the goods, not as a supplier, which is outside the scope of an advance ruling as per Section 95(a) of the CGST and TNGST Act. Therefore, this question was not admitted for consideration.

4. Method of Arriving Value for Effluent Using the Net Realization Price Method:
Similarly, the ruling did not address the method of arriving at the value for the effluent using the net realization price method. This question was also raised as a recipient of the goods, which is not permissible under the advance ruling provisions. Hence, this question was not admitted for consideration.

Conclusion:
The ruling concluded that the applicant's proposed model of purchasing raw effluent, treating it, and selling the resultant products classifies the outputs as the sale of goods. The recovered water is correctly classified under CTH 2201 as waters described under Sl.No.24 of Annexure-III of Notification No. 01/2017-C.T. (Rate). The questions regarding the classification of the raw effluent and the method of arriving at its value were not addressed as they fall outside the scope of an advance ruling for the applicant as a recipient of the goods.

---