Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned demand and recovery notice issued against the purchaser of the property could be sustained despite the absence of prior notice or encumbrance and the department's failure to follow the prescribed recovery procedure.
Analysis: The arrears were admittedly due from the defaulting company, not from the petitioner. The property had been purchased without any encumbrance shown in the records, and the department had not promptly taken steps to secure its claim by following the statutory recovery mechanism. The legal framework relied upon in the decision recognizes that tax arrears may create a charge on the defaulter's property, but enforcement against transferred property requires strict adherence to the recovery procedure and cannot prejudice an innocent purchaser who bought without notice. A purchaser in the chain of title, without collusion and without knowledge of any subsisting charge, is protected against belated recovery action where the department remained inactive for years.
Conclusion: The recovery notice could not be sustained against the petitioner, and the challenge succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The impugned notice was quashed, and the writ petition was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory charge for tax arrears cannot be enforced against a bona fide purchaser for value without notice unless the authority has strictly complied with the prescribed recovery procedure and given public notice of the encumbrance.