TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Modifies Order for Director's ID Reactivation Amid Management Dispute</h1> <h3>Garima Rungta Versus Union of India and others.</h3> Garima Rungta Versus Union of India and others. - TMI Issues:1. Recall of an Order dated March 8, 2021 passed in WPA No. 6697 of 2020.Analysis:Issue 1: Recall of the OrderThe applicant sought the recall of an order that re-activated the Directors Identification Number (DIN) of the writ petitioner. The applicant argued that the order under recall not only re-activated the DIN but also set aside an earlier order by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) regarding the non-approval of documents due to a management dispute. The applicant contended that the portion of the order setting aside the ROC's decision was beyond the scope of the writ petition. The Circular dated February 10, 2012, was referred to, which stipulated that in case of a management dispute, documents filed by the company and contesting directors would not be approved or available for public viewing until the dispute is resolved. The court found that while the re-activation of the DIN was justified, setting aside the ROC's order was in contravention of the Circular and, therefore, bad in law. The court allowed the recall application, setting aside the part of the order related to the ROC's decision but maintained the re-activation of the DIN. The writ petitioner was permitted to discharge her duties as a director, but the bar on approval/registration/recording of documents remained until the management dispute was settled.In conclusion, the court recalled and modified the order to re-activate the DIN of the writ petitioner but upheld the ROC's decision regarding the non-approval of documents due to the ongoing management dispute. The court clarified that the writ petitioner could fulfill her directorial duties but the documents' approval and availability in the registry were subject to the resolution of the management dispute.
TaxTMI 