Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Approval of Scheme of Amalgamation under Companies Act, 2013

        In Re : Silversand Distributors Limited and Ors.

        In Re : Silversand Distributors Limited and Ors. - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013.
        2. Dispensation of meetings of equity shareholders and creditors.
        3. Compliance with statutory requirements and notifications.
        4. Justification and necessity of the Scheme of Amalgamation.
        5. Observations and objections raised by the Regional Director.
        6. Responses and rejoinders by the petitioner companies.
        7. Compliance with accounting standards and statutory audits.
        8. Compliance with Section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013 regarding buyback of shares.
        9. Final approval and sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013:
        The petitioners, Silversand Distributors Limited (Transferor Company) and Prarthana Sales Private Limited (Transferee Company), sought approval for a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The scheme intended to transfer all assets, properties, rights, and obligations of the Transferor Company to the Transferee Company.

        2. Dispensation of meetings of equity shareholders and creditors:
        The Tribunal dispensed with the meetings of the equity shareholders and creditors of the petitioner companies based on consent letters and affidavits received, as per the order dated 5th February 2019, in CA(CAA)914/KB/2018.

        3. Compliance with statutory requirements and notifications:
        The petitioners served notices to the Central Government through the Regional Director, Registrar of Companies, West Bengal, and other regulatory authorities. Joint publication in newspapers was made, and an affidavit was filed with the Tribunal confirming compliance with the order dated 5th February 2019.

        4. Justification and necessity of the Scheme of Amalgamation:
        The petitioners justified the amalgamation on several grounds, including consolidation of group structure, synergies in business activities, economies of scale, and enhanced profitability. The amalgamation aimed to establish a larger company with greater resources and a larger capital base, benefiting shareholders, employees, and all concerned.

        5. Observations and objections raised by the Regional Director:
        The Regional Director raised several objections in affidavits affirmed on 5th August 2019, 6th January 2020, and 12th February 2020, including:
        - Clause 13.2 of the scheme not complying with Section 232(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013.
        - The appointed date being too old (1st April 2017).
        - Defective accounting treatment contrary to Accounting Standard-14.
        - Non-compliance with Section 68 regarding buyback of shares.
        - Lack of response from the Income Tax Department.

        6. Responses and rejoinders by the petitioner companies:
        The petitioners filed rejoinders addressing the Regional Director's observations:
        - Provided statements showing clubbing of authorized capital.
        - Justified the appointed date as per Ministry of Corporate Affairs' clarification.
        - Amended the scheme to comply with the pooling of interest method under Accounting Standard 14.
        - Submitted a certificate from the company's statutory auditor regarding accounting treatment.
        - Clarified that clause 11.2 did not amount to a buyback of shares.

        7. Compliance with accounting standards and statutory audits:
        The petitioners rectified the mistake of not initially providing a certificate from the statutory auditor and submitted the required certificate confirming that the scheme's accounting treatment conformed to prescribed standards.

        8. Compliance with Section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013 regarding buyback of shares:
        The petitioners clarified that clause 11.2 dealt with fractional shares and did not amount to a buyback of shares. They undertook to settle fractional entitlements in cash, ensuring compliance with relevant provisions.

        9. Final approval and sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation:
        The Tribunal, after considering all submissions, affidavits, and rejoinders, found no impediment in sanctioning the Scheme of Amalgamation. The scheme was sanctioned with effect from 1st April 2017, and all properties, rights, liabilities, and proceedings of the Transferor Company were transferred to the Transferee Company. The Transferor Company was dissolved without winding up, and the petitioners were directed to comply with all statutory requirements.

        Order:
        The Scheme of Amalgamation was sanctioned, binding the Transferor and Transferee Companies and their respective shareholders. The petitioners were directed to deliver a certified copy of the order to the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal, within 30 days. The CP No. 426/KB/2019, connected with CA (CAA) No. 914/KB/2018, was disposed of accordingly.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found