Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the purchaser of a liquidation asset could be made liable for municipal tax dues that had accrued prior to the date of sale, and whether the municipality could withhold trade licence, enlistment certificate, or mutation on the basis of those pre-sale dues.
Analysis: The liquidation of the corporate debtor was governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which operates as a self-contained mechanism for inviting, verifying, and adjudicating claims in liquidation. The municipality did not lodge its claim with the liquidator after the public announcement and instead sought to recover alleged arrears from the purchaser by issuing a demand notice. The Court held that the municipality could not bypass the insolvency framework and use municipal processes to compel payment of past dues from the auction purchaser. It further held that the reliance placed on the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 was misplaced in view of the overriding effect of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Conclusion: The purchaser was not liable to pay municipal dues accruing before the sale, and the demand notice for such dues was unsustainable. The municipality was directed to consider the applications for licence, enlistment certificate, and mutation on their own merits without being influenced by the pending pre-sale dues.