Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods specified under Chapter IVB of the Customs Act, 1962 are to be treated as export goods for the purpose of confiscation under Section 113(1) and penalty under Section 114.
Analysis: Chapter IVB was enacted to prevent or detect illegal export of goods. Under Section 11I, the Central Government may specify goods for a specified area having regard to the likelihood of illegal export. Once goods are so specified, a legal fiction operates and they are treated as goods likely to be illegally exported for the purposes of the Act. The absence of proof that the goods were actually intended to be taken out of India does not prevent confiscation where the statutory fiction applies.
Conclusion: The specified silver was liable to confiscation under Section 113(1), and the penalty under Section 114 was sustainable. The revision was rejected against the assessee.