Trade parlance and tariff description: blower fans with external motors were treated as electric fans under excise classification.

Blowers and exhaust fans driven by an external electric motor through a V-belt can fall within the description of electric fans if a built-in motor is not essential to the tariff entry. The governing approach was technical and trade parlance: goods operated by electric power from an external source, and described in trade as blower fans, were treated as the same class of goods as electric fans. On that basis, the articles were classified under item 33(2) of the Central Excise Tariff, the appellate classification was set aside, and the original duty demand was restored in favour of Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether blowers and exhaust fans driven by an external electric motor through a V-belt, without an in-built motor, are classifiable as electric fans under item 33(2) of the Central Excise Tariff.

Analysis: The governing test was whether a built-in motor was essential for an article to answer the description of an electric fan. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that the tariff entry did not require an integral motor and that goods operated by electric power from an external source could still be electric fans. Support was taken from technical and trade usage showing that fans and blowers are treated as the same class of goods, and that the impugned articles were designed for industrial use. The description adopted by the manufacturers themselves also indicated that the goods were understood in trade as blower fans.

Conclusion: The blowers and exhaust fans were held to be electric fans classifiable under item 33(2) of the Central Excise Tariff. The classification adopted by the appellate authority was set aside and the original duty demand was restored, in favour of Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: An article need not have an in-built motor to be classifiable as an electric fan if, in technical and trade parlance, it is an electrically operated fan or blower.

---