Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scheme of amalgamation deserved sanction under the Companies Act, 2013 in view of the Regional Director's observations and the compliance/undertakings furnished by the petitioner company.
Analysis: The petition was supported by board approvals, compliance affidavits, and undertakings addressing the Regional Director's observations on accounting treatment, appointed date, creditor notices, consistency of the scheme documents, statutory notices to concerned authorities, fee set-off on authorised capital, income-tax compliance, stamp duty, FEMA/RBI compliance, and jurisdictional coordination with the Chennai Bench. The Regional Director accepted the explanations and raised no objection. On the record, the scheme was found to be fair, reasonable, not violative of law, and not contrary to public policy. The tribunal also recorded that the statutory requirements had been fulfilled and that the scheme was to operate subject to sanction by the Chennai Bench.
Conclusion: The scheme was sanctioned and the company scheme petition was allowed, with the appointed date fixed as 1 April 2020 and subject to sanction by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench.