Court remands case over assessment orders due to COVID impact, directs fresh hearing with deposit requirement

The Court remanded the case concerning assessment orders for discrepancies in reported turnovers, emphasizing the impact of COVID-19 on proceedings. The petitioner's failure to submit relevant documents during the lockdown led to impugned orders. To ensure fair adjudication, the Court directed a fresh hearing with a deposit requirement of 10% of the tax, penalty, and interest. The assessing authority was instructed to issue new orders promptly without unnecessary adjournments. Failure to meet the deposit deadline would result in the continuation of the impugned orders. The Court stressed the need for independent reconsideration and closed the writ petitions with no costs awarded.

---

---

Issues:
Assessment orders imposing tax, penalty, and interest for discrepancies in reported turnovers, violation of principles of natural justice and fair procedure, impact of COVID-19 lockdown on proceedings, consideration of relevant documents, necessity of fair adjudication, suspension of impugned orders, remand for fresh hearing, deposit requirement, timeline for fresh orders, avoidance of unnecessary adjournments, independent reconsideration, continuation of impugned orders in case of failure to deposit.

Analysis:
The writ petitions challenged assessment orders for discrepancies in reported turnovers from works contracts with the Forest Department. The petitioner argued that due to a lockdown, they couldn't submit relevant documents to exempt tax liability, alleging a violation of natural justice. The Assistant Government Pleader contended that the petitioner had the opportunity to respond but failed to do so, leading to the impugned orders.

The Court acknowledged the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on proceedings but noted that the petitioner could have communicated difficulties to seek an adjournment. They distinguished a previous case cited by the petitioner based on the timing of events during the lockdown. While the petitioner claimed tax liability exemption due to deductions at the source, as relevant documents were not submitted to the assessing authority, this aspect was not considered.

To balance the petitioner's inaction in responding to notices and the need for fair adjudication, the Court decided to remand the matter for a fresh hearing under specific conditions. The petitioner was directed to deposit 10% of the tax, penalty, and interest within four weeks for the impugned orders to be suspended. The assessing authority was instructed to conduct a fresh hearing, consider all submitted documents, and issue new orders within eight weeks without unnecessary adjournments.

The Court emphasized that the fresh consideration should be independent, in accordance with the law, and not influenced by previous observations. If the petitioner failed to meet the deposit requirement within the specified timeframe, the impugned orders would remain in force. The writ petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs, and any related miscellaneous petitions were to be closed accordingly.

---