Insolvency overrides pre-purchase vehicle tax claims, and auction purchasers face only post-purchase statutory dues on transfer.

In liquidation, statutory dues relating to vehicles sold from a corporate debtor's estate are to be pursued under the insolvency framework, which operates with overriding effect over inconsistent recovery mechanisms. Auction purchasers are not liable for pre-purchase dues attributable to the corporate debtor, and such claims must be addressed through the liquidation process. The transfer of vehicle ownership cannot be withheld merely because earlier dues remain unpaid, but transport authorities may require payment of dues arising from the date of purchase and may process transfer subject to the governing statutory procedure and pending proceedings.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether statutory dues relating to the vehicles sold in liquidation could be recovered from the auction purchasers for the period prior to their purchase, and whether the insolvency regime overrides the recovery mechanism under motor vehicle tax law. (ii) Whether the transfer of ownership of the purchased vehicles should be completed by the Regional Transport Offices and, if so, on what terms regarding post-purchase statutory dues.

Issue (i): Whether statutory dues relating to the vehicles sold in liquidation could be recovered from the auction purchasers for the period prior to their purchase, and whether the insolvency regime overrides the recovery mechanism under motor vehicle tax law.

Analysis: Claims for dues arising in respect of the corporate debtor were treated as claims to be dealt with in liquidation under the insolvency code. The liquidation framework provides a waterfall mechanism for distribution of assets, and the code operates with overriding effect over inconsistent laws. On that basis, statutory dues relatable to the vehicles belonging to the corporate debtor could not be fastened on the auction purchasers for the period before their purchase. Any such claims had to be pursued in accordance with the insolvency process.

Conclusion: The dues for the period prior to purchase could not be recovered from the auction purchasers, and the insolvency code prevailed over the inconsistent recovery process.

Issue (ii): Whether the transfer of ownership of the purchased vehicles should be completed by the Regional Transport Offices and, if so, on what terms regarding post-purchase statutory dues.

Analysis: The purchasers had acquired the vehicles in liquidation sale proceedings, and their ownership transfer could not be withheld merely because pre-purchase dues were outstanding against the corporate debtor. At the same time, the purchasers could be directed to meet statutory dues arising from the date of purchase, and the transfer process could be linked to payment of a portion of the dues communicated by the transport authorities, while preserving the effect of pending proceedings.

Conclusion: The transfer proceedings were directed to be completed, with liability confined to statutory dues from the date of purchase and subject to the pending proceedings.

Final Conclusion: The petitioners obtained relief against recovery of pre-purchase statutory dues and secured directions for transfer of the vehicles, but the transfer and related payments were made subject to the outcome of pending proceedings and limited post-purchase liability.

Ratio Decidendi: In liquidation, statutory dues connected with the corporate debtor must be pursued under the insolvency framework, and auction purchasers cannot be saddled with pre-purchase liabilities; only dues arising after purchase can be required from them, subject to the governing statutory process.

---