Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported water pump integral shaft bearings were classifiable as ball bearings under Heading 84.62 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or as parts of water pumps under Heading 84.10(3) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the consequential countervailing duty classification.
Analysis: The article was found to be not a mere bearing but an assembly in which the bearing was integrally built with the shaft and used as a functional part of the water pump. On its construction, use, trade description, and marketing, it was held to be essentially a machine part incorporating a bearing, so Section note 2(a) to Section XVI had no application. The article was further held to fall outside Heading 84.62 and, by application of Section note 2(b) to Section XVI, to be more appropriately classified as a part of the water pump. Once so classified, the question between the sub-headings of Heading 84.62 became irrelevant, and the corresponding countervailing duty treatment followed the pump-part classification.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 84.10(3) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and not under Heading 84.62, with countervailing duty attracted accordingly.