TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Initiated after Fire Incident</h1> <h3>Hariom Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus Subhash Agrawal</h3> Hariom Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus Subhash Agrawal - TMI Issues:1. Application filed under Section 10 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiation.2. Financial crisis due to fire incident leading to inability to pay debts.3. Submission of necessary documents and appointment of Interim Resolution Professional.4. Admittance of application and issuance of moratorium order.5. Prohibitions under Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.6. Appointment and duties of Interim Resolution Professional.7. Payment of fees to Interim Resolution Professional and time-bound conduct of CIRP.8. Convening a meeting of the Committee of Creditors and submission of Resolution Plan.Detailed Analysis:1. The application was filed under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by a Corporate Person seeking to start the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to the inability to pay a debt of Rs. 27,33,57,528.36. The Company faced financial crisis after a fire incident, resulting in non-payment to creditors and classification as a Non-Performing Asset (N.P.A).2. The applicant submitted that the loss from the fire incident led to the Company's inability to repay debts, causing the Directors to doubt the Company's ability to recover. The application included all necessary information and documents, such as the Board Resolution authorizing the application and the proposed Interim Resolution Professional.3. The Tribunal admitted the application and issued a moratorium order as per Section 13 and 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The moratorium prohibits various actions against the Corporate Debtor, including instituting suits, transferring assets, or enforcing security interests.4. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed to oversee the process, with specific duties such as convening a meeting of the Committee of Creditors, ascertaining creditors' particulars, and evolving a Resolution Plan. The applicant was directed to pay an advance fee to the Interim Resolution Professional as per regulations.5. The Resolution Professional was instructed to conduct the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in a time-bound manner and submit progress reports. The Interim Resolution Professional was further directed to convene a meeting of the Committee of Creditors and file necessary reports as per the regulations.6. The Registry was tasked with communicating the Order to the Corporate Applicant/Debtor and the Interim Resolution Professional. The Order outlined the necessary steps to be taken for the resolution process, ensuring compliance with the legal requirements and procedures.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
