Interim protection against reassessment enforcement granted while pending excise appeals are decided expeditiously.

Pending appeals before the excise appellate tribunal did not by themselves render the reassessment orders unsustainable, but the possibility of success in those appeals justified interim protection against immediate enforcement of the impugned sales tax orders. The HC therefore kept the reassessment orders in abeyance for a limited period, directed expedited disposal of the pending excise appeals, and preserved the assessee's right to pursue further remedies depending on the outcome. The orders were not quashed, and the matter was disposed of without a final adjudication on the merits of the reassessment.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reassessment orders based on the findings of the Central Excise Department could be kept in abeyance pending disposal of the assessee's appeals before the appellate excise tribunal.

Analysis: The reassessment was not found to be unsustainable merely because appeals against the excise department's final orders were pending. At the same time, the Court held that the possibility of the excise appeals succeeding warranted interim protection so that the impugned sales tax orders would not be enforced immediately. The Court therefore directed the appellate tribunal to dispose of the pending appeals within a fixed time and kept the impugned orders in abeyance for that period, leaving the assessee at liberty to pursue further remedies depending on the result of those appeals.

Conclusion: The writ petitions were disposed of with interim protection to the petitioner and without finally adjudicating the merits of the reassessment orders.

Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were not quashed, but their enforcement was suspended for a limited period to enable the pending excise appeals to be decided expeditiously, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to renew the challenge thereafter.

---