Documentary acknowledgment of debt and timely filing sustained section 7 insolvency admission despite an unproved financial service exemption.

Documentary acknowledgment of liability by the corporate debtor, including successive balance confirmations, was treated as sufficient proof of debt and default, despite the debtor's challenge to the transaction's nature. The petition was also found within limitation because Article 137 of the Limitation Act, applied through section 238A of the IBC, captured defaults occurring within three years of filing. The respondent's claim that it was a non-banking financial company failed for want of RBI registration or recognition, so it was not shown to fall outside section 7 insolvency proceedings. The section 7 application was therefore maintainable and CIRP was directed to commence.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether debt and default were proved; (ii) Whether the petition was barred by limitation; (iii) Whether the respondent was a non-banking financial company and therefore outside the insolvency framework.

Issue (i): Whether debt and default were proved

Analysis: The financial creditor established disbursement of the amount and relied on balance confirmations issued by the corporate debtor for successive years, certifying the statements of account as true and correct. Those acknowledgments were treated as an admission of liability. The dispute raised by the corporate debtor regarding the nature of the transaction did not displace the documentary acknowledgment of debt and default.

Conclusion: Debt and default were proved in favour of the petitioner.

Issue (ii): Whether the petition was barred by limitation

Analysis: Limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applied through section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The defaults were shown to have occurred within the three-year period preceding the filing of the petition, and the latest default brought the application within time. The petition was therefore not barred by limitation.

Conclusion: The petition was not barred by limitation.

Issue (iii): Whether the respondent was a non-banking financial company and therefore outside the insolvency framework

Analysis: The respondent failed to produce proof of registration or recognition from the Reserve Bank of India as a non-banking financial company. Mere assertion of financial-service status was insufficient. On the material before it, the respondent was not shown to be a financial service provider exempt from section 7 proceedings.

Conclusion: The respondent was not established to be the insolvency process on the ground of being a non-banking financial company.

Final Conclusion: The application under section 7 was maintainable and the corporate insolvency resolution process was directed to commence, along with moratorium and appointment of an interim resolution professional.

Ratio Decidendi: Documentary acknowledgment of liability by the corporate debtor, coupled with timely filing within the limitation period, is sufficient to admit a section 7 insolvency application, and a claim of exemption as a financial service provider must be supported by proof of RBI-recognised status.

---