Pre-existing dispute defeats section 9 insolvency claim when proceedings are used as a recovery mechanism.

A section 9 IBC application is not maintainable where a genuine pre-existing dispute existed before the demand notice, including disputes over quality of work, contractual non-completion, bill certification, and prior arbitration-related communications. The tribunal applied the principle that operational insolvency cannot be used as a mere recovery tool, and rejected the petition because the dispute was real rather than spurious, hypothetical, or illusory. The materials also did not show that the corporate debtor was insolvent, and instead indicated an active and compliant company. On that basis, the proceeding was treated as an attempt to convert a recovery claim into insolvency proceedings and was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was maintainable in the face of a pre-existing dispute and whether insolvency proceedings could be used as a substitute for recovery of dues.

Analysis: The dispute on quality of work, non-completion of contractual obligations, certification of running account bills, and the respondent's prior communications and arbitration notice showed a genuine dispute existing before the demand notice. The legal position applied was that operational insolvency cannot be triggered for a mere recovery claim and that a section 9 application must be rejected where there is a real dispute that is not spurious, hypothetical, or illusory. The record also did not establish that the corporate debtor was insolvent; rather, the materials indicated an active and compliant company. On that basis, the petition was treated as an attempt to convert a recovery claim into insolvency proceedings.

Conclusion: The section 9 application was not maintainable and was rejected against the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: A section 9 insolvency must fail where a genuine pre-existing dispute exists before the demand notice or where the proceeding is being used as a recovery mechanism rather than to address insolvency.

---