Contingent repayment under escrow-backed financing does not constitute default unless the debt has crystallised

A section 7 petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found not maintainable where the alleged default depended on the lender's release of additional security, project completion, and escrow-based realisation of receivables. The Tribunal treated the repayment obligation as contractually contingent on these linked commercial arrangements rather than as an immediate, unconditional debt. Because the liability had not crystallised into a due and payable default on the facts pleaded, a legally enforceable default was not established against the corporate debtor.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was maintainable when the alleged default depended upon the lender's release of additional security and the flow of project receivables through the escrow mechanism.

Analysis: The default alleged by the financial creditor arose in a commercial structure where repayment was linked to the release of additional security, the completion of the project, and the realisation of receivables through the escrow account. The agreed arrangement showed that the borrower's repayment obligations were not to be viewed in isolation from the lender's own contractual obligations and the project-linked cash flows. On the facts, the Tribunal found that the non-payment claimed by the financial creditor was not an unconditional or crystallised default, but one dependent upon contingencies built into the parties' arrangements. The Tribunal also noted the continuing correspondence between the parties, the completion of the project, the occupation certificate, and the ongoing receipts being routed through the escrow account.

Conclusion: The petition under section 7 was not maintainable on the facts as pleaded, since a legally enforceable default under the Code was not made out against the corporate debtor.

Ratio Decidendi: Where repayment under a loan structure is contractually contingent upon the lender's own performance and project-linked escrow receipts, non-payment does not amount to default for the purpose of section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 unless the liability has crystallised as a due and payable debt.

---