Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods, being cross-linking agents used in textile processing and not having acquired the state of resin, fell within Entry 15A of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The goods were found to be cross-linking agents formed by reaction of urea or modified urea or cyclic urea derivatives with formaldehyde. They were meant for use in textile mills for processing textile fabrics. At the stage of application on textiles, they remained low molecular weight precondensates and reacted with cellulose molecules in the fabrics. On this finding, they had not acquired the state of resin and therefore did not answer the description covered by Entry 15A.
Conclusion: The goods were held to fall outside the ambit of Entry 15A of the Central Excise Tariff, and the revision application was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The classification dispute was resolved against the revenue, with the goods treated as not exigible under the invoked tariff entry.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods which remain low molecular weight precondensates and have not acquired the character of resin do not fall within a tariff entry directed at resin.