Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Ruling: TDS applies to supplies over Rs. 2,50,000, based on total value or invoice amount</h1> The authority ruled that Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) is applicable to all supplies when the value of supply under a contract or purchase order exceeds ... Interpretation of the term β€œa contract” - TDS applicability under section 51 of the GST Act - no contract or contract of continuous supply - whether the single tax invoice shall be considered as β€œa contract” or aggregate value of purchase from a vendor for the whole year be considered as a contract? - HELD THAT:- Coming to the meaning of β€œsupply under a contract”, it is very well accepted that there must be a supplier and a recipient for a supply to happen and these two persons must be either distinct persons or deemed to be distinct persons under the Act. When there is a supply of goods or services from one person to another, it has to be as a follow up action of an agreement to supply, either written or verbal or implied. There is no precondition that the agreement to supply should always be in writing and the same is governed under the Contract Act, 1872. The β€œagreement to sell” and the contract of β€œSale of Goods” as envisaged in the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 also are governed under the Contract Act, 1872. Further, sale of goods is only a subset of β€œsupply” as envisaged in Section 7(1) of the GST Act and hence all contracts covered under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 are also contracts under the GST Acts - The agreement between the supplier and the recipient is of prime consideration and if it is for a continuous supply to be made in installments, then the contract would include all the part supplies made and covered under separate invoices. It is in this context, the supply under a contract should be understood and the total value of such supply under a contract, if it exceeds β‚Ή 2,50,000-00 would be liable for deduction of tax at source, subject to other conditions. The agreement of continuous supply is a contract for scenario no, 3 and 4 and if the amount involved in the supply in this contract exceeds β‚Ή 2.5 lakhs, then the applicant is supposed to deduct TDS on the payment credited to the vendor - In the first scenario, since the value of the single invoice is more than β‚Ή 2.5 lakh, there is no doubt that the tax deduction at source is applicable under section 51 subject to other conditions. In the second scenario, the applicant has clearly stated that the value of supply under a single invoice does not exceed β‚Ή 2.5 Lakhs and assuming that it is a single transaction as per the purchase order, then tax deduction at source is not applicable on that single transaction or invoice. But if it is a part supply and a part of the continuous supply as per the purchase order, then if the total value of supply as mentioned in the purchase order is more than β‚Ή 2.5 Lakh, then the provisions of tax deduction at source would become applicable even on this invoice. Issues Involved:1. Interpretation of the term 'a contract' for TDS applicability under Section 51 of the GST Act.2. Applicability of TDS provisions in the absence of a contract or in the case of continuous supply contracts.3. Whether a single tax invoice can be considered 'a contract' or if the aggregate value of purchases from a vendor for the whole year should be considered as a contract.Detailed Analysis:1. Interpretation of 'a contract' for TDS applicability under Section 51 of the GST Act:The applicant sought clarification on the meaning of 'a contract' for TDS applicability under Section 51 of the GST Act. The applicant argued that in the absence of a formal contract, each tax invoice should be considered as 'a contract' for TDS purposes. The applicant referred to provisions from the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, and the Contract Act, 1872, to support their interpretation that each tax invoice could be construed as 'a contract' for TDS purposes.2. Applicability of TDS provisions in the absence of a contract or in the case of continuous supply contracts:The applicant presented four scenarios to illustrate different procurement situations:- Scenario 1: Procurement without a contract, with a single invoice exceeding Rs. 2,50,000.- Scenario 2: Procurement without a contract, with individual invoices below Rs. 2,50,000 but total annual purchases exceeding this limit.- Scenario 3: Continuous supply contract with individual invoices and total annual supply below Rs. 2,50,000.- Scenario 4: Continuous supply contract with individual invoices below Rs. 2,50,000 but total annual supply exceeding this limit.The applicant argued that TDS provisions should be interpreted differently for each scenario, suggesting that in the absence of a formal contract, TDS should not be applicable if the individual invoice value is below Rs. 2,50,000.3. Whether a single tax invoice can be considered 'a contract' or if the aggregate value of purchases from a vendor for the whole year should be considered as a contract:The applicant contended that each tax invoice should be considered as 'a contract' for TDS purposes, especially when there is no formal contract in place. They argued that the aggregate value of purchases from a vendor for the whole year should not be considered as a contract for TDS applicability.Authority's Discussion and Findings:The authority examined the submissions from the applicant, the departmental authorities, and relevant legal provisions. They noted that Section 51 of the GST Act mandates TDS deduction if the total value of supply under a contract exceeds Rs. 2,50,000. The authority clarified that the term 'a contract' does not necessarily require a written agreement and can be verbal or implied, governed by the Contract Act, 1872.The authority emphasized that the supply under a contract, rather than the invoice value, is the criterion for determining TDS liability. They explained that a contract for continuous supply involves multiple part supplies covered under separate invoices, and the total value of such supplies should be considered for TDS applicability.Ruling:The authority ruled that TDS is applicable to all supplies if the value of supply under a contract (scenarios 3 and 4) or purchase order (scenario 2) exceeds Rs. 2,50,000. For scenario 1, the invoice value is considered for determining the 'value of supply' under a contract.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found