Loose diary entries need corroboration before income additions can stand; unverified notings alone are insufficient.

Additions based solely on notings in a scribbling pad seized during search were unsustainable where the assessee explained that the entries reflected gross receipts already recorded in the regular books after commission and designing charges. The books were produced, no material defects were found, and the department brought no independent evidence of suppressed turnover, unaccounted assets, or unexplained expenditure. In the absence of corroboration or linkage between the loose entries and the regular records, the diary notings could not be treated as undisclosed income on mere estimate or presumption, and the additions were rightly deleted.

---

---

Issues: Whether additions made on the basis of a scribbling pad/loose diary found during search, by treating the notings as undisclosed income and extrapolating them for the full year without corroborative evidence, were sustainable.

Analysis: The additions were founded only on notings in a scribbling pad seized during search. The assessee explained that the notings represented gross receipts after deduction of agents' commission/designing charges and that the receipts and related transactions were already reflected in the regular books of account. The books were produced, no material defects were found, and no independent evidence of suppressed turnover, unaccounted assets, or unexplained expenditure was brought on record. The notings were not matched with the books, no corroborative material was found, and the tribunal found that the department could not disprove the assessee's explanation. In the absence of supporting evidence, the diary entries could not be treated as undisclosed income merely on estimate or presumption.

Conclusion: The additions based solely on the scribbling pad and extrapolation were not justified and were rightly deleted; the assessee succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Loose or scribbled entries, without corroboration and without linkage to the regular books or independent evidence of suppression, cannot by themselves form the basis of an income addition.

---