TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Invalidates Assessment Conversion, Emphasizes CBDT Compliance</h1> <h3>M/s Ropar Properties and Builders Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (2)</h3> M/s Ropar Properties and Builders Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (2) - TMI Issues Involved:1. Conversion of limited scrutiny into full scrutiny assessment without valid reasons.2. Disallowance of expenses on ad hoc basis without credible material.3. Compliance with CBDT instructions for converting limited scrutiny to complete scrutiny.Analysis:Issue 1: Conversion of Limited Scrutiny into Full Scrutiny AssessmentThe appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) converting the limited scrutiny assessment into a full scrutiny assessment. The Assessing Officer (AO) made disallowances on an ad hoc basis without valid reasons. The counsel for the assessee argued that the AO lacked reliable reasons for converting the assessment. The CBDT instruction No. 5/2016 highlighted the need for a reasonable view based on credible material to convert limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny. However, the AO failed to provide any credible material or information to support the conversion. The Tribunal found the conversion invalid as it did not comply with the CBDT mandate, leading to unsustainable additions by the AO.Issue 2: Disallowance of Expenses on Ad Hoc BasisThe AO disallowed various expenses, including advertisement expenses, donation, and development expenses, on an ad hoc basis without substantial evidence. The counsel for the assessee argued that the disallowances were made without proper justification or reliable material. The Tribunal observed that the disallowances lacked a direct nexus between the available material and the possibility of under assessment of income. As a result, the disallowances were deemed unsustainable in the eyes of the law, and the Tribunal ordered their deletion.Issue 3: Compliance with CBDT InstructionsThe Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to CBDT instructions when converting limited scrutiny assessments into full scrutiny assessments. The instructions required a reasonable view based on credible material to justify such a conversion. In this case, the AO failed to meet the criteria set out in the CBDT instructions, rendering the conversion and subsequent additions unsustainable. The Tribunal upheld the appeal of the assessee, highlighting the necessity of following procedural guidelines and ensuring a valid basis for scrutiny assessments.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the significance of following procedural requirements and basing assessments on credible material rather than ad hoc decisions. The judgment underscored the need for assessments to be conducted in accordance with legal provisions and established guidelines to maintain fairness and objectivity in tax proceedings.
TaxTMI 