Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether interim protection should be granted against coercive recovery pursuant to the impugned demand notice pending consideration of the petitioner's representation for fixation of special rate; (ii) whether the authority should be directed to dispose of the pending representation within a specified time.
Issue (i): Whether interim protection should be granted against coercive recovery pursuant to the impugned demand notice pending consideration of the petitioner's representation for fixation of special rate.
Conclusion: Interim protection was granted and the authorities were restrained from taking coercive action pursuant to the impugned demand notice until a decision was taken on the representation(s).
Issue (ii): Whether the authority should be directed to dispose of the pending representation within a specified time.
Conclusion: The Commissioner was directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation for fixation of special rate within four weeks from receipt of a certified copy of the order.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was dealt with by way of interim directions preserving the petitioner's position pending consideration of the requested special rate.