Government of India upholds independence of Fanta & Campa manufacturers; brand use not ownership implication The Government of India reviewed a case involving the manufacture of Fanta and Campa. It was determined that the party independently manufactured the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Government of India upholds independence of Fanta & Campa manufacturers; brand use not ownership implication
The Government of India reviewed a case involving the manufacture of Fanta and Campa. It was determined that the party independently manufactured the products and was not working on behalf of Coca-Cola or Pure Drinks. The government agreed that the use of brand names does not imply manufacturing on behalf of the brand owners. Consequently, the review proceedings were dropped, upholding the order-in-appeal.
The Government of India reviewed a case involving the manufacture of Fanta and Campa. The party argued that they independently manufactured the products and were not working on behalf of Coca-Cola or Pure Drinks. The government agreed with the party's contentions, stating that the use of brand names does not imply manufacturing on behalf of the brand owners. The review proceedings were dropped, upholding the order-in-appeal. (Case Citation: 1978 (2) TMI 105 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.