TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land is to be treated as part of compensation and exempt under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or as taxable income under the head "Income from Other Sources" under sections 56 and 145A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could survive after deletion of the quantum addition.
Issue (i): Whether interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land is to be treated as part of compensation and exempt under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or as taxable income under the head "Income from Other Sources" under sections 56 and 145A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the earlier binding view that interest awarded under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is an accretion to the value of the land and forms part of enhanced compensation. On that basis, the amount is not assessable separately as interest income under section 56 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision also proceeded on the settled position that taxability, where applicable, is on receipt basis and not on accrual spread over years. Since the compensation itself was exempt under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the addition made on this account could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The receipt under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was held to be part of compensation and not taxable as interest income under sections 56 and 145A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Issue (ii): Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could survive after deletion of the quantum addition.
Analysis: The penalty was founded entirely on the quantum addition relating to taxability of the interest on enhanced compensation. Once the quantum addition was upheld as unsustainable, the basis for the penalty disappeared. No independent ground for sustaining the penalty was found.
Conclusion: The penalty deletion was upheld and the assessee succeeded on this issue as well.
Final Conclusion: The departmental appeals failed in entirety, the quantum addition was not restored, and the consequential penalty relief remained undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest awarded under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on enhanced compensation is part of compensation itself and, where the compensation is exempt, cannot be separately taxed as interest income; a penalty dependent solely on such deleted addition cannot survive.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
