Tax appeal dismissed for AY 2010-11, upheld for AY 2011-12 under Income Tax Act Sections 68, 69A.

The appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11 was dismissed due to the failure to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of transactions, resulting in the addition of Rs. 4,50,000. For Assessment Year 2011-12, the appeal was partly allowed, with an addition of Rs. 2,80,000 confirmed and Rs. 32,20,000 deleted. The tribunal upheld the additions under Sections 68 and 69A of the Income Tax Act for the respective years.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
2. Non-provision of the reasons recorded for initiating assessment under Section 147.
3. Addition of Rs. 4,50,000 for Assessment Year 2010-11 and Rs. 35,00,000 for Assessment Year 2011-12 as unexplained income.
4. Non-admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A.
5. Application of Sections 68 and 69A of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Assessment Proceedings:
The assessee challenged the validity of assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act for both assessment years. However, these legal grounds were not pressed by the assessee's counsel during the tribunal proceedings. Consequently, these grounds were dismissed as not pressed.

2. Non-Provision of Reasons for Assessment:
The assessee contended that the reasons recorded for initiating assessment under Section 147 were not provided. This ground was also not pursued further by the assessee's counsel and was dismissed.

3. Addition of Rs. 4,50,000 for AY 2010-11:
The addition was made based on three amounts credited in the bank account:
- Rs. 1,35,000 on 24.04.2009
- Rs. 1,50,000 on 05.05.2009
- Rs. 1,65,000 on 27.04.2009

The assessee claimed these amounts were loans from Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, supported by a loan confirmation letter and bank statement. However, the tribunal found that equal amounts of cash were deposited in Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari's account a day before issuing the cheques, and no evidence was provided to explain the source of this cash. The tribunal concluded that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions, thus confirming the addition of Rs. 4,50,000.

4. Addition of Rs. 35,00,000 for AY 2011-12:
The assessee argued that the cash balance of Rs. 20,52,304 as on 31.03.2010 was available for the subsequent year. The Assessing Officer (A.O) accepted the source for Rs. 30,00,000 but doubted the remaining Rs. 5,00,000. The tribunal noted that the assessee failed to provide a clear explanation for the cash deposits and withdrawals. However, considering the facts, the tribunal treated the cash deposit of Rs. 35,00,000 as unaccounted business receipts and applied a net profit rate of 8%, resulting in an addition of Rs. 2,80,000. The tribunal thus deleted the addition of Rs. 32,20,000 and confirmed Rs. 2,80,000.

5. Non-Admission of Additional Evidence:
The assessee claimed that additional evidence under Rule 46A was not admitted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). This ground was also not pursued further by the assessee's counsel and was dismissed.

6. Application of Sections 68 and 69A:
For AY 2010-11, the tribunal upheld the addition under Section 68, as the assessee failed to explain the source of credits adequately. For AY 2011-12, the tribunal partially allowed the appeal by treating the cash deposits as unaccounted business receipts under Section 69A and applying an 8% net profit rate.

Conclusion:
- The appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11 was dismissed.
- The appeal for Assessment Year 2011-12 was partly allowed, with an addition of Rs. 2,80,000 confirmed and Rs. 32,20,000 deleted.

The order was pronounced on 30.04.2021.

---